VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash0stats won
Tied3stats
Gemini 3.7 Flash3stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Gemini 3.8 FlashvsGemini 3.7 Flash

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Gemini 3.8 Flash vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 73).

  1. Composite score
    Gemini 3.8 Flash73Gemini 3.7 Flash74Winner on this row
  2. Benchmark mix
    Gemini 3.8 Flash73Gemini 3.7 Flash74Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Gemini 3.8 Flash1MGemini 3.7 Flash1M
  4. Max output
    Gemini 3.8 Flash64KGemini 3.7 Flash64K
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.75Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.75
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Gemini 3.8 Flash132 t/sGemini 3.7 Flash314 t/sWinner on this row
Composite score
73
vs
74Winner on this row
Benchmark mix
73
vs
74Winner on this row
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
64K
vs
64K
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$0.75
vs
$0.75
Output speed (AA default API)
132 t/s
vs
314 t/sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash
Text●●
Image●●
Audio●●
Video●●
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash
API●●
Consumer app●●
Open weights——
Managed cloud●●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
95
vs
95
Coding
57
vs
57
Agentic
88Winner on this row
vs
86
Long context
81
vs
82Winner on this row
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#2/184 · #5/184
95.3%Winner on this row
vs
94.5%
Humanity's Last Exam#15/186 · #13/186
47.8%
vs
47.9%Winner on this row

Coding

SciCode#15/97 · #13/97
56.6%
vs
57.2%Winner on this row

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#10/167 · #13/167
87.64%Winner on this row
vs
85.77%

Long context

AA-LCR#29/184 · #25/184
81.33%
vs
81.67%Winner on this row

Performance

AA output speed#35/195 · #4/195
132 t/s
vs
314 t/sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleGoogle
FamilyGemini 3.8Gemini 3.7
Release date2026-09-022026-08-13
Knowledge cutoff2026-03-01unpublished
Context window1M1M
Max output64K64K
Input price /1M$0.75$0.75
Output price /1M$3.8$3.8
Statusflagshipflagship
Composite score7374
Intelligence score7374
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows67
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-182026-09-05
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Gemini 3.8 Flash vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 73).

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Gemini 3.8 Flash vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 73).

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: $0.75 / $3.8. Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.75 / $3.8.

How do the Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.7 Flash context windows compare?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1M. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1M.