VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 1 Sep 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max vs Qwen3.8 Max

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max4stats won
Tied0stats
Qwen3.8 Max3stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxvsQwen3.8 Max

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max holds a narrow composite edge (73 vs 66), but the gap is small enough that other factors matter more. Qwen3.8 Max has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (58 vs 56). DeepSeek V4 Pro Max is significantly cheaper at $0.40/1M input vs $2.0/1M input. Qwen3.8 Max's 1M context window dwarfs DeepSeek V4 Pro Max's 256K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.

  1. Composite score
    DeepSeek V4 Pro Max73Winner on this rowQwen3.8 Max66
  2. Intelligence (Vals/AA)
    DeepSeek V4 Pro Max56Qwen3.8 Max58Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    DeepSeek V4 Pro Max256KQwen3.8 Max1MWinner on this row
  4. Max output
    DeepSeek V4 Pro Max66KWinner on this rowQwen3.8 Max
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    DeepSeek V4 Pro Max$0.40Winner on this rowQwen3.8 Max$2.0
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxQwen3.8 Max40 t/sWinner on this row
  7. Time to first token (AA default API)
    DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxWinner on this rowQwen3.8 Max1.46s
Composite score
73Winner on this row
vs
66
Intelligence (Vals/AA)
56
vs
58Winner on this row
Context window
256K
vs
1MWinner on this row
Max output
66KWinner on this row
vs
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$0.40Winner on this row
vs
$2.0
Output speed (AA default API)
vs
40 t/sWinner on this row
Time to first token (AA default API)
Winner on this row
vs
1.46s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxQwen3.8 Max
Text
Image
Audio
Video
Code
Tool use
Reasoning

Access

DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxQwen3.8 Max
API
Consumer app
Open weights
Managed cloud
On-device
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
76
vs
93Winner on this row
Coding
93Winner on this row
vs
53
Agentic
68
vs
81Winner on this row
Long context
49
vs
74Winner on this row
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#152/185 · #16/185
75.6%
vs
92.7%Winner on this row

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#49/184 · #20/184
67.9%
vs
81.27%Winner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

DeepSeek V4 Pro MaxQwen3.8 Max
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
FamilyDeepSeekQwen
Release date2026-04-242026-08-03
Knowledge cutoff2026-02-01unpublished
Context window256K1M
Max output66K
Input price /1M$0.40$2.0
Output price /1M$1.6$6.0
Statusflagshipflagship
Composite score7366
Intelligence score5658
Intel sourcevalsaa
Benchmark rows1510
Source count111
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-06-012026-08-12
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Qwen3.8 Max

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Max holds a narrow composite edge (73 vs 66), but the gap is small enough that other factors matter more. Qwen3.8 Max has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (58 vs 56). DeepSeek V4 Pro Max is significantly cheaper at $0.40/1M input vs $2.0/1M input. Qwen3.8 Max's 1M context window dwarfs DeepSeek V4 Pro Max's 256K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.