Pick two models. See the diff.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Spec showdown
Capacity, price, freshness.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.
- Composite scoreClaude Sonnet 5.50Claude Opus 5.570Winner on this row
- Benchmark mixClaude Sonnet 5.50Claude Opus 5.570Winner on this row
- Context windowClaude Sonnet 5.51MClaude Opus 5.51M
- Max outputClaude Sonnet 5.5128KClaude Opus 5.5128K
- Input price / 1M (lower wins)Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.0Winner on this rowClaude Opus 5.5$4.0
- Output speed (AA default API)Claude Sonnet 5.5135 t/sWinner on this rowClaude Opus 5.596 t/s
Capability grid
What each model can do.
Modalities
Access
Family profile
Top score per benchmark family.
No shared benchmark families between these two models.
Benchmark ranks
Every shared benchmark, side by side.
Performance
Dossier facts
Dates, sources, fineprint.
Ecosystem
Which tools wrap each model.
Claude Opus 5.5
Verdict
Which model to actually pick.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.
Questions this comparison answers
Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.
Should you use Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper?
Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.0 / $10. Claude Opus 5.5: $4.0 / $20.
How do the Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 context windows compare?
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1M. Claude Opus 5.5: 1M.