VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.52stats won
Tied2stats
Claude Opus 5.52stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Claude Sonnet 5.5vsClaude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.

  1. Composite score
    Claude Sonnet 5.50Claude Opus 5.570Winner on this row
  2. Benchmark mix
    Claude Sonnet 5.50Claude Opus 5.570Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Claude Sonnet 5.51MClaude Opus 5.51M
  4. Max output
    Claude Sonnet 5.5128KClaude Opus 5.5128K
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.0Winner on this rowClaude Opus 5.5$4.0
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Claude Sonnet 5.5135 t/sWinner on this rowClaude Opus 5.596 t/s
Composite score
0
vs
70Winner on this row
Benchmark mix
0
vs
70Winner on this row
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
128K
vs
128K
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$2.0Winner on this row
vs
$4.0
Output speed (AA default API)
135 t/sWinner on this row
vs
96 t/s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5.5
Text●●
Image●●
Audio——
Video——
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5.5
API●●
Consumer app●●
Open weights——
Managed cloud●●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

No shared benchmark families between these two models.

Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Performance

AA output speed#34/195 · #60/195
135 t/sWinner on this row
vs
96 t/s
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5.5
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude SonnetClaude Opus
Release date2026-09-282026-09-22
Knowledge cutoffJun 2026Jun 2026
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input price /1M$2.0$4.0
Output price /1M$10$20
Statusflagshipflagship
Composite score070
Intelligence score070
Intel sourcenonecomposite
Benchmark rows14
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-282026-09-28
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads on composite score (70 vs 0), with deeper benchmark coverage across more families. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more affordable at $2.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $4.0/1M.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.0 / $10. Claude Opus 5.5: $4.0 / $20.

How do the Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 context windows compare?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1M. Claude Opus 5.5: 1M.