Pick two models. See the diff.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Spec showdown
Capacity, price, freshness.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 63 for GPT-5.6 Sol. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (73 vs 68). GPT-5.6 Sol is more affordable at $4.0/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $10/1M. Claude Fable 5.1's 1M context window dwarfs GPT-5.6 Sol's 0 — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.
- Composite scoreClaude Fable 5.167Winner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol63
- Intelligence (Vals/AA)Claude Fable 5.168GPT-5.6 Sol73Winner on this row
- Context windowClaude Fable 5.11MWinner on this rowGPT-5.6 SolUnlisted
- Max outputClaude Fable 5.1128KWinner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol—
- Input price / 1M (lower wins)Claude Fable 5.1$10GPT-5.6 Sol$4.0Winner on this row
- Output speed (AA default API)Claude Fable 5.1—GPT-5.6 Sol77 t/sWinner on this row
- Time to first token (AA default API)Claude Fable 5.1—Winner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol91.64s
Capability grid
What each model can do.
Modalities
Access
Family profile
Top score per benchmark family.
Benchmark ranks
Every shared benchmark, side by side.
Knowledge
Reasoning
Agentic
Dossier facts
Dates, sources, fineprint.
Ecosystem
Which tools wrap each model.
GPT-5.6 Sol
Not listed in any tool yet.
Verdict
Which model to actually pick.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 63 for GPT-5.6 Sol. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (73 vs 68). GPT-5.6 Sol is more affordable at $4.0/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $10/1M. Claude Fable 5.1's 1M context window dwarfs GPT-5.6 Sol's 0 — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.