VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 1 Sep 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Claude Fable 5.14stats won
Tied0stats
GPT-5.6 Sol3stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Claude Fable 5.1vsGPT-5.6 Sol

Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 63 for GPT-5.6 Sol. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (73 vs 68). GPT-5.6 Sol is more affordable at $4.0/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $10/1M. Claude Fable 5.1's 1M context window dwarfs GPT-5.6 Sol's 0 — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.

  1. Composite score
    Claude Fable 5.167Winner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol63
  2. Intelligence (Vals/AA)
    Claude Fable 5.168GPT-5.6 Sol73Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Claude Fable 5.11MWinner on this rowGPT-5.6 SolUnlisted
  4. Max output
    Claude Fable 5.1128KWinner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Claude Fable 5.1$10GPT-5.6 Sol$4.0Winner on this row
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Claude Fable 5.1GPT-5.6 Sol77 t/sWinner on this row
  7. Time to first token (AA default API)
    Claude Fable 5.1Winner on this rowGPT-5.6 Sol91.64s
Composite score
67Winner on this row
vs
63
Intelligence (Vals/AA)
68
vs
73Winner on this row
Context window
1MWinner on this row
vs
Unlisted
Max output
128KWinner on this row
vs
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$10
vs
$4.0Winner on this row
Output speed (AA default API)
vs
77 t/sWinner on this row
Time to first token (AA default API)
Winner on this row
vs
91.64s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-5.6 Sol
Text
Image
Audio
Video
Code
Tool use
Reasoning

Access

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-5.6 Sol
API
Consumer app
Open weights
Managed cloud
On-device
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Knowledge
67Winner on this row
vs
59
Reasoning
66
vs
94Winner on this row
Agentic
68
vs
88Winner on this row
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience#1/12 · #4/12
67%Winner on this row
vs
59.4%

Reasoning

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#1/184 · #6/184
66%Winner on this row
vs
60.9%

Agentic

Vals Index#6/22 · #3/22
67.87%
vs
73.1%Winner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-5.6 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude FableGPT-5.6
Release date2026-09-012026-07-09
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01unpublished
Context window1MUnlisted
Max output128K
Input price /1M$10$4.0
Output price /1M$50$20
Statussolidflagship
Composite score6763
Intelligence score6873
Intel sourcevalsvals
Benchmark rows317
Source count25
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-012026-09-01
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

GPT-5.6 Sol

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 63 for GPT-5.6 Sol. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (73 vs 68). GPT-5.6 Sol is more affordable at $4.0/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $10/1M. Claude Fable 5.1's 1M context window dwarfs GPT-5.6 Sol's 0 — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.