VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 1 Sep 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next4stats won
Tied2stats
Qwen3.8 27B1stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextvsQwen3.8 27B

Composite scores are within 5 points — 63 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs 60 for Qwen3.8 27B. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (56 vs 52). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is significantly cheaper at $0.15/1M input vs $0.50/1M input.

  1. Composite score
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next63Winner on this rowQwen3.8 27B60
  2. Intelligence (Vals/AA)
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next56Winner on this rowQwen3.8 27B52
  3. Context window
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next262KQwen3.8 27B262K
  4. Max output
    Qwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen3.8 27B
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next$0.15Winner on this rowQwen3.8 27B$0.50
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next87 t/sWinner on this rowQwen3.8 27B45 t/s
  7. Time to first token (AA default API)
    Qwen3.8-Flash-Next1.27sQwen3.8 27B1.21sWinner on this row
Composite score
63Winner on this row
vs
60
Intelligence (Vals/AA)
56Winner on this row
vs
52
Context window
262K
vs
262K
Max output
vs
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$0.15Winner on this row
vs
$0.50
Output speed (AA default API)
87 t/sWinner on this row
vs
45 t/s
Time to first token (AA default API)
1.27s
vs
1.21sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen3.8 27B
Text
Image
Audio
Video
Code
Tool use
Reasoning

Access

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen3.8 27B
API
Consumer app
Open weights
Managed cloud
On-device
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
92Winner on this row
vs
91
Coding
47Winner on this row
vs
45
Agentic
86Winner on this row
vs
80
Long context
77
vs
77
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#20/184 · #31/184
55.8%Winner on this row
vs
52%
GPQA Diamond#21/185 · #39/185
92.3%Winner on this row
vs
90.5%
Humanity's Last Exam#42/180 · #57/180
38%Winner on this row
vs
33.9%

Coding

SciCode#67/180 · #84/180
46.9%Winner on this row
vs
44.7%

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#8/184 · #26/184
86.14%Winner on this row
vs
79.78%
τ³-Bench Banking#8/106 · #5/106
45.36%
vs
48.04%Winner on this row

Long context

AA-LCR#30/179 · #25/179
77%
vs
77.33%Winner on this row

Performance

AA output speed#46/185 · #73/185
87 t/sWinner on this row
vs
45 t/s
AA time to first token#54/185 · #57/185
1.27s
vs
1.21sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Qwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen3.8 27B
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
FamilyQwenQwen
Release date2026-08-262026-08-14
Knowledge cutoffunpublishedunpublished
Context window262K262K
Max output
Input price /1M$0.15$0.50
Output price /1M$0.47$3.0
Statussolidsolid
Composite score6360
Intelligence score5652
Intel sourceaaaa
Benchmark rows99
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-012026-08-24
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Not listed in any tool yet.

Qwen3.8 27B

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 63 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs 60 for Qwen3.8 27B. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (56 vs 52). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is significantly cheaper at $0.15/1M input vs $0.50/1M input.