VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Fable 5.13stats won
Tied2stats
GPT-6 Astra1stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Claude Fable 5.1vsGPT-6 Astra

Composite scores are within 5 points — 77 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 75 for GPT-6 Astra. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Fable 5.1 has the higher benchmark mix (77 vs 75).

  1. Composite score
    Claude Fable 5.177Winner on this rowGPT-6 Astra75
  2. Benchmark mix
    Claude Fable 5.177Winner on this rowGPT-6 Astra75
  3. Context window
    Claude Fable 5.11MGPT-6 Astra1MWinner on this row
  4. Max output
    Claude Fable 5.1128KGPT-6 Astra128K
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Claude Fable 5.1$10GPT-6 Astra$10
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Claude Fable 5.167 t/sWinner on this rowGPT-6 Astra64 t/s
Composite score
77Winner on this row
vs
75
Benchmark mix
77Winner on this row
vs
75
Context window
1M
vs
1MWinner on this row
Max output
128K
vs
128K
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$10
vs
$10
Output speed (AA default API)
67 t/sWinner on this row
vs
64 t/s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
Text●●
Image●●
Audio——
Video——
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
API●●
Consumer app●●
Open weights——
Managed cloud●●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
94
vs
96Winner on this row
Coding
63Winner on this row
vs
57
Agentic
91Winner on this row
vs
88
Long context
85Winner on this row
vs
81
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#8/184 · #1/184
93.7%
vs
96.1%Winner on this row
Humanity's Last Exam#2/186 · #5/186
59.1%Winner on this row
vs
54.7%

Coding

SciCode#2/97 · #16/97
63.1%Winner on this row
vs
56.5%

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#1/167 · #4/167
91.39%Winner on this row
vs
88.39%

Long context

AA-LCR#3/184 · #32/184
85.33%Winner on this row
vs
80.67%

Performance

AA output speed#91/195 · #97/195
67 t/sWinner on this row
vs
64 t/s
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude FableGPT-6
Release date2026-09-012026-09-03
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-012026-04-30
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input price /1M$10$10
Output price /1M$50$50
Statussolidflagship
Composite score7775
Intelligence score7775
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows76
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-182026-09-18
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 77 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 75 for GPT-6 Astra. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Fable 5.1 has the higher benchmark mix (77 vs 75).

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?

Composite scores are within 5 points — 77 for Claude Fable 5.1 vs 75 for GPT-6 Astra. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Fable 5.1 has the higher benchmark mix (77 vs 75).

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra cheaper?

Claude Fable 5.1: $10 / $50. GPT-6 Astra: $10 / $50.

How do the Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra context windows compare?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1M. GPT-6 Astra: 1M.