VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.32stats won
Tied3stats
Muse Spark 1.21stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Muse Spark 1.3vsMuse Spark 1.2

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Muse Spark 1.3 vs 70 for Muse Spark 1.2. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Muse Spark 1.3 has the higher benchmark mix (73 vs 70).

  1. Composite score
    Muse Spark 1.373Winner on this rowMuse Spark 1.270
  2. Benchmark mix
    Muse Spark 1.373Winner on this rowMuse Spark 1.270
  3. Context window
    Muse Spark 1.31MMuse Spark 1.21M
  4. Max output
    Muse Spark 1.3—Muse Spark 1.2—
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Muse Spark 1.3$1.3Muse Spark 1.2$1.3
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Muse Spark 1.3190 t/sMuse Spark 1.2272 t/sWinner on this row
Composite score
73Winner on this row
vs
70
Benchmark mix
73Winner on this row
vs
70
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
—
vs
—
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$1.3
vs
$1.3
Output speed (AA default API)
190 t/s
vs
272 t/sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Muse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.2
Text●●
Image●●
Audio—●
Video●●
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Muse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.2
API●●
Consumer app●●
Open weights——
Managed cloud——
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
94Winner on this row
vs
90
Coding
59Winner on this row
vs
57
Agentic
84Winner on this row
vs
80
Long context
83Winner on this row
vs
79
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#12/184 · #42/184
93.5%Winner on this row
vs
90.4%
Humanity's Last Exam#12/186 · #20/186
48.7%Winner on this row
vs
45.5%

Coding

SciCode#8/97 · #12/97
58.8%Winner on this row
vs
57.4%

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#17/167 · #25/167
84.27%Winner on this row
vs
80.15%

Long context

AA-LCR#16/184 · #56/184
83%Winner on this row
vs
79%

Performance

AA output speed#18/195 · #6/195
190 t/s
vs
272 t/sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Muse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderMetaMeta
FamilyMuse SparkMuse Spark
Release date2026-09-022026-08-05
Knowledge cutoffunpublishedunpublished
Context window1M1M
Max output——
Input price /1M$1.3$1.3
Output price /1M$4.3$4.3
Statusflagshipsolid
Composite score7370
Intelligence score7370
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows66
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-052026-08-12
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Muse Spark 1.3

Not listed in any tool yet.

Muse Spark 1.2

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Muse Spark 1.3 vs 70 for Muse Spark 1.2. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Muse Spark 1.3 has the higher benchmark mix (73 vs 70).

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Muse Spark 1.3 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Composite scores are within 5 points — 73 for Muse Spark 1.3 vs 70 for Muse Spark 1.2. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Muse Spark 1.3 has the higher benchmark mix (73 vs 70).

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Muse Spark 1.2 cheaper?

Muse Spark 1.3: $1.3 / $4.3. Muse Spark 1.2: $1.3 / $4.3.

How do the Muse Spark 1.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 context windows compare?

Muse Spark 1.3: 1M. Muse Spark 1.2: 1M.