VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1stats won
Tied2stats
Qwen3.8 Max3stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BvsQwen3.8 Max

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs 72 for Qwen3.8 Max. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Qwen3.8 Max has the higher benchmark mix (72 vs 70). Qwen3.8 Max's 1M context window dwarfs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 262K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.

  1. Composite score
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B70Qwen3.8 Max72Winner on this row
  2. Benchmark mix
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B70Qwen3.8 Max72Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B262KQwen3.8 Max1MWinner on this row
  4. Max output
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B—Qwen3.8 Max—
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$2.0Qwen3.8 Max$2.0
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B37 t/sWinner on this rowQwen3.8 Max36 t/s
Composite score
70
vs
72Winner on this row
Benchmark mix
70
vs
72Winner on this row
Context window
262K
vs
1MWinner on this row
Max output
—
vs
—
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$2.0
vs
$2.0
Output speed (AA default API)
37 t/sWinner on this row
vs
36 t/s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Max
Text●●
Image—●
Audio——
Video——
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Max
API●●
Consumer app——
Open weights●—
Managed cloud—●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
94Winner on this row
vs
93
Coding
54Winner on this row
vs
52
Agentic
82
vs
89Winner on this row
Long context
80
vs
80
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#13/184 · #20/184
93.5%Winner on this row
vs
92.8%
Humanity's Last Exam#32/186 · #25/186
42.4%
vs
43.1%Winner on this row

Coding

SciCode#29/97 · #36/97
54.1%Winner on this row
vs
52.1%

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#20/167 · #3/167
82.02%
vs
88.76%Winner on this row

Long context

AA-LCR#37/184 · #38/184
80.33%
vs
80.33%

Performance

AA output speed#138/195 · #140/195
37 t/sWinner on this row
vs
36 t/s
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Max
ProviderAlibabaAlibaba
FamilyQwenQwen
Release date2026-08-122026-08-03
Knowledge cutoffunpublishedunpublished
Context window262K1M
Max output——
Input price /1M$2.0$2.0
Output price /1M$6.0$6.0
Statussolidflagship
Composite score7072
Intelligence score7072
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows67
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-08-152026-09-28
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Not listed in any tool yet.

Qwen3.8 Max

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs 72 for Qwen3.8 Max. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Qwen3.8 Max has the higher benchmark mix (72 vs 70). Qwen3.8 Max's 1M context window dwarfs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 262K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3.8 Max?

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs 72 for Qwen3.8 Max. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Qwen3.8 Max has the higher benchmark mix (72 vs 70). Qwen3.8 Max's 1M context window dwarfs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 262K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.

Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3.8 Max cheaper?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $2.0 / $6.0. Qwen3.8 Max: $2.0 / $6.0.

How do the Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3.8 Max context windows compare?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 262K. Qwen3.8 Max: 1M.