VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Kimi K3 vs MiniMax M3

Kimi K30stats won
Tied1stats
MiniMax M35stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Kimi K3vsMiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 holds a narrow composite edge (65 vs 58), but the gap is small enough that other factors matter more. MiniMax M3 has the higher benchmark mix (65 vs 58). MiniMax M3 is significantly cheaper at $0.30/1M input vs $3.0/1M input.

  1. Composite score
    Kimi K358MiniMax M365Winner on this row
  2. Benchmark mix
    Kimi K358MiniMax M365Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Kimi K31MMiniMax M31M
  4. Max output
    Kimi K3—MiniMax M366KWinner on this row
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Kimi K3$3.0MiniMax M3$0.30Winner on this row
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Kimi K342 t/sMiniMax M3107 t/sWinner on this row
Composite score
58
vs
65Winner on this row
Benchmark mix
58
vs
65Winner on this row
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
—
vs
66KWinner on this row
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$3.0
vs
$0.30Winner on this row
Output speed (AA default API)
42 t/s
vs
107 t/sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Kimi K3MiniMax M3
Text●●
Image●●
Audio——
Video—●
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Kimi K3MiniMax M3
API●●
Consumer app●—
Open weights●●
Managed cloud●●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
94Winner on this row
vs
93
Coding
60Winner on this row
vs
47
Long context
89Winner on this row
vs
83
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#11/184 · #17/184
93.5%Winner on this row
vs
92.9%
Humanity's Last Exam#17/186 · #48/186
46.9%Winner on this row
vs
39%

Coding

SciCode#5/97 · #58/97
59.5%Winner on this row
vs
47.1%

Long context

AA-LCR#1/184 · #15/184
88.67%Winner on this row
vs
83%

Performance

AA output speed#134/195 · #54/195
42 t/s
vs
107 t/sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Kimi K3MiniMax M3
ProviderMoonshotMiniMax
FamilyKimi K3MiniMax
Release date2026-07-162026-05-31
Knowledge cutoffunpublished2026-03-01
Context window1M1M
Max output—66K
Input price /1M$3.0$0.30
Output price /1M$15$1.2
Statussolidsolid
Composite score5865
Intelligence score5865
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows105
Source count21
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-09-232026-09-28
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Kimi K3

Not listed in any tool yet.

MiniMax M3

Not listed in any tool yet.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

MiniMax M3 holds a narrow composite edge (65 vs 58), but the gap is small enough that other factors matter more. MiniMax M3 has the higher benchmark mix (65 vs 58). MiniMax M3 is significantly cheaper at $0.30/1M input vs $3.0/1M input.

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 holds a narrow composite edge (65 vs 58), but the gap is small enough that other factors matter more. MiniMax M3 has the higher benchmark mix (65 vs 58). MiniMax M3 is significantly cheaper at $0.30/1M input vs $3.0/1M input.

Is Kimi K3 or MiniMax M3 cheaper?

Kimi K3: $3.0 / $15. MiniMax M3: $0.30 / $1.2.

How do the Kimi K3 and MiniMax M3 context windows compare?

Kimi K3: 1M. MiniMax M3: 1M.