VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)0stats won
Tied3stats
Gemini 3.7 Flash3stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)vsGemini 3.7 Flash

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 70).

  1. Composite score
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)70Gemini 3.7 Flash74Winner on this row
  2. Benchmark mix
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)70Gemini 3.7 Flash74Winner on this row
  3. Context window
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)1MGemini 3.7 Flash1M
  4. Max output
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)64KGemini 3.7 Flash64K
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)$0.75Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.75
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)186 t/sGemini 3.7 Flash314 t/sWinner on this row
Composite score
70
vs
74Winner on this row
Benchmark mix
70
vs
74Winner on this row
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
64K
vs
64K
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$0.75
vs
$0.75
Output speed (AA default API)
186 t/s
vs
314 t/sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)Gemini 3.7 Flash
Text●●
Image●●
Audio●●
Video●●
Code●●
Tool use●●
Reasoning●●

Access

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)Gemini 3.7 Flash
API●●
Consumer app●●
Open weights——
Managed cloud●●
On-device——
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
93
vs
95Winner on this row
Coding
53
vs
57Winner on this row
Agentic
78
vs
86Winner on this row
Multimodal
83
vs
86Winner on this row
Long context
80
vs
82Winner on this row
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

GPQA Diamond#19/184 · #5/184
92.8%
vs
94.5%Winner on this row
Humanity's Last Exam#39/186 · #13/186
40.8%
vs
47.9%Winner on this row

Coding

SciCode#32/97 · #13/97
53.4%
vs
57.2%Winner on this row

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#32/167 · #13/167
77.53%
vs
85.77%Winner on this row

Long context

AA-LCR#40/184 · #25/184
80%
vs
81.67%Winner on this row

Performance

AA output speed#22/195 · #4/195
186 t/s
vs
314 t/sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)Gemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleGoogle
FamilyGemini 3.6Gemini 3.7
Release date2026-07-212026-08-13
Knowledge cutoffunpublishedunpublished
Context window1M1M
Max output64K64K
Input price /1M$0.75$0.75
Output price /1M$3.8$3.8
Statussolidflagship
Composite score7074
Intelligence score7074
Intel sourcecompositecomposite
Benchmark rows77
Source count11
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-08-132026-09-05
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 70).

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Composite scores are within 5 points — 70 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) vs 74 for Gemini 3.7 Flash. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher benchmark mix (74 vs 70).

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) or Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper?

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high): $0.75 / $3.8. Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.75 / $3.8.

How do the Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) and Gemini 3.7 Flash context windows compare?

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high): 1M. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1M.