VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 1 Sep 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5

Gemini 3.7 Flash6stats won
Tied1stats
Claude Sonnet 50stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Gemini 3.7 FlashvsClaude Sonnet 5

Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Gemini 3.7 Flash vs 62 for Claude Sonnet 5. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (56 vs 55). Gemini 3.7 Flash is more affordable at $0.75/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $2.0/1M.

  1. Composite score
    Gemini 3.7 Flash67Winner on this rowClaude Sonnet 562
  2. Intelligence (Vals/AA)
    Gemini 3.7 Flash56Winner on this rowClaude Sonnet 555
  3. Context window
    Gemini 3.7 Flash1MClaude Sonnet 51M
  4. Max output
    Gemini 3.7 Flash64KWinner on this rowClaude Sonnet 5
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.75Winner on this rowClaude Sonnet 5$2.0
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Gemini 3.7 Flash307 t/sWinner on this rowClaude Sonnet 580 t/s
  7. Time to first token (AA default API)
    Gemini 3.7 Flash7.00sWinner on this rowClaude Sonnet 5142.07s
Composite score
67Winner on this row
vs
62
Intelligence (Vals/AA)
56Winner on this row
vs
55
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
64KWinner on this row
vs
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$0.75Winner on this row
vs
$2.0
Output speed (AA default API)
307 t/sWinner on this row
vs
80 t/s
Time to first token (AA default API)
7.00sWinner on this row
vs
142.07s
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Sonnet 5
Text
Image
Audio
Video
Code
Tool use
Reasoning

Access

Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Sonnet 5
API
Consumer app
Open weights
Managed cloud
On-device
Family profile

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
95Winner on this row
vs
91
Coding
57Winner on this row
vs
54
Agentic
86Winner on this row
vs
81
Long context
80Winner on this row
vs
77
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#18/184 · #21/184
56%Winner on this row
vs
55.3%
GPQA Diamond#3/185 · #30/185
94.5%Winner on this row
vs
91.1%
Humanity's Last Exam#8/180 · #27/180
47.9%Winner on this row
vs
41.3%

Coding

SciCode#5/180 · #20/180
56.8%Winner on this row
vs
53.6%

Agentic

Terminal-Bench#9/184 · #22/184
85.77%Winner on this row
vs
80.52%
τ³-Bench Banking#32/106 · #23/106
32.78%
vs
37.32%Winner on this row

Long context

AA-LCR#6/179 · #27/179
80%Winner on this row
vs
77%

Performance

AA output speed#6/185 · #49/185
307 t/sWinner on this row
vs
80 t/s
AA time to first token#16/185 · #1/185
7.00sWinner on this row
vs
142.07s
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Sonnet 5
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
FamilyGemini 3.7Claude Sonnet
Release date2026-08-132026-06-30
Knowledge cutoffunpublishedopen
Context window1M1M
Max output64K
Input price /1M$0.75$2.0
Output price /1M$3.8$10
Statusflagshipsolid
Composite score6762
Intelligence score5655
Intel sourceaaaa
Benchmark rows1010
Source count12
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-08-132026-07-09
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Gemini 3.7 Flash vs 62 for Claude Sonnet 5. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (56 vs 55). Gemini 3.7 Flash is more affordable at $0.75/1M input — about 3× cheaper than $2.0/1M.