Pick two models. See the diff.
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Spec showdown
Capacity, price, freshness.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Gemini 3.5 Flash vs 66 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (60 vs 49). Gemini 3.5 Flash is significantly cheaper at $0.30/1M input vs $3.0/1M input.
- Composite scoreGemini 3.5 Flash67Winner on this rowClaude Sonnet 4.666
- Intelligence (Vals/AA)Gemini 3.5 Flash49Claude Sonnet 4.660Winner on this row
- Context windowGemini 3.5 Flash1MClaude Sonnet 4.61M
- Max outputGemini 3.5 Flash66KClaude Sonnet 4.6128KWinner on this row
- Input price / 1M (lower wins)Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.30Winner on this rowClaude Sonnet 4.6$3.0
- Output speed (AA default API)Gemini 3.5 Flash287 t/sWinner on this rowClaude Sonnet 4.660 t/s
- Time to first token (AA default API)Gemini 3.5 Flash12.11sClaude Sonnet 4.61.18sWinner on this row
Capability grid
What each model can do.
Modalities
Access
Family radar
Top score per benchmark family.
Benchmark ranks
Every shared benchmark, side by side.
Knowledge
Reasoning
Coding
Agentic
Multimodal
Long context
Tool use
Human preference
Performance
Dossier facts
Dates, sources, fineprint.
Ecosystem
Which tools wrap each model.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Verdict
Which model to actually pick.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 67 for Gemini 3.5 Flash vs 66 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (60 vs 49). Gemini 3.5 Flash is significantly cheaper at $0.30/1M input vs $3.0/1M input.