VerdictPal · editorial desk · 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Two models, head-to-head

Pick two models. See the diff.

Composite scores, benchmark ranks, capability grids, and pricing per million tokens. All sourced from the same data that powers the model atlas.

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Claude Fable 53stats won
Tied2stats
Claude Opus 4.82stats won
Spec showdown

Capacity, price, freshness.

Claude Fable 5vsClaude Opus 4.8

Composite scores are within 5 points — 72 for Claude Fable 5 vs 73 for Claude Opus 4.8. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Fable 5 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (75 vs 70). Claude Fable 5 is more affordable at $10/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $15/1M.

  1. Composite score
    Claude Fable 572Claude Opus 4.873Winner on this row
  2. Intelligence (Vals/AA)
    Claude Fable 575Winner on this rowClaude Opus 4.870
  3. Context window
    Claude Fable 51MClaude Opus 4.81M
  4. Max output
    Claude Fable 5128KClaude Opus 4.8128K
  5. Input price / 1M (lower wins)
    Claude Fable 5$10Winner on this rowClaude Opus 4.8$15
  6. Output speed (AA default API)
    Claude Fable 570 t/sWinner on this rowClaude Opus 4.863 t/s
  7. Time to first token (AA default API)
    Claude Fable 568.33sClaude Opus 4.830.13sWinner on this row
Composite score
72
vs
73Winner on this row
Intelligence (Vals/AA)
75Winner on this row
vs
70
Context window
1M
vs
1M
Max output
128K
vs
128K
Input price / 1M (lower wins)
$10Winner on this row
vs
$15
Output speed (AA default API)
70 t/sWinner on this row
vs
63 t/s
Time to first token (AA default API)
68.33s
vs
30.13sWinner on this row
Capability grid

What each model can do.

Modalities

Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8
Text
Image
Audio
Video
Code
Tool use
Reasoning

Access

Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8
API
Consumer app
Open weights
Managed cloud
On-device
Family radar

Top score per benchmark family.

Reasoning
93Winner on this row
vs
80
Coding
70
vs
96Winner on this row
Agentic
100
vs
100
Long context
70Winner on this row
vs
58
Benchmark ranks

Every shared benchmark, side by side.

Reasoning

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#1/67 · #4/67
59.9%Winner on this row
vs
55.7%
GPQA Diamond#8/69 · #51/69
92.6%Winner on this row
vs
79.8%
Humanity's Last Exam#1/65 · #3/65
53.3%Winner on this row
vs
45.7%
IFBench#39/57 · #41/57
63.47%Winner on this row
vs
62.24%

Coding

DeepSWE#1/6 · #3/6
70%Winner on this row
vs
59%
SciCode#1/65 · #14/65
60.2%Winner on this row
vs
53.5%

Agentic

GDPval#1/6 · #2/6
1818Winner on this row
vs
1638
Terminal-Bench#4/69 · #17/69
84.64%Winner on this row
vs
74.6%
Vals Index#1/20 · #5/20
75.1%Winner on this row
vs
70.4%
τ³-Bench Banking#15/64 · #30/64
62.4%Winner on this row
vs
27.63%

Long context

AA-LCR#22/64 · #48/64
70%Winner on this row
vs
58.3%

Performance

AA output speed#40/69 · #45/69
70 t/sWinner on this row
vs
63 t/s
AA time to first token#7/69 · #13/69
68.33s
vs
30.13sWinner on this row
Dossier facts

Dates, sources, fineprint.

Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude FableClaude Opus
Release date2026-06-092026-05-28
Knowledge cutoff2026-04-012026-02-01
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input price /1M$10$15
Output price /1M$50$75
Statusflagshipflagship
Composite score7273
Intelligence score7570
Intel sourcevalsvals
Benchmark rows1426
Source count412
Freshnessfreshfresh
Pricing checked2026-06-092026-06-01
Ecosystem

Which tools wrap each model.

Verdict

Which model to actually pick.

Composite scores are within 5 points — 72 for Claude Fable 5 vs 73 for Claude Opus 4.8. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Fable 5 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (75 vs 70). Claude Fable 5 is more affordable at $10/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $15/1M.