Pick two models. See the diff.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.4
Spec showdown
Capacity, price, freshness.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 66 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs 61 for GPT 5.4. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (60 vs 51). Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more affordable at $3.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $7.0/1M. Claude Sonnet 4.6's 1M context window dwarfs GPT 5.4's 256K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.
- Composite scoreClaude Sonnet 4.666Winner on this rowGPT 5.461
- Intelligence (Vals/AA)Claude Sonnet 4.660Winner on this rowGPT 5.451
- Context windowClaude Sonnet 4.61MWinner on this rowGPT 5.4256K
- Max outputClaude Sonnet 4.6128KWinner on this rowGPT 5.466K
- Input price / 1M (lower wins)Claude Sonnet 4.6$3.0Winner on this rowGPT 5.4$7.0
- Output speed (AA default API)Claude Sonnet 4.660 t/sGPT 5.4152 t/sWinner on this row
- Time to first token (AA default API)Claude Sonnet 4.61.18sWinner on this rowGPT 5.4129.43s
Capability grid
What each model can do.
Modalities
Access
Family radar
Top score per benchmark family.
Benchmark ranks
Every shared benchmark, side by side.
Knowledge
Reasoning
Coding
Agentic
Long context
Tool use
Human preference
Performance
Dossier facts
Dates, sources, fineprint.
Ecosystem
Which tools wrap each model.
Verdict
Which model to actually pick.
Composite scores are within 5 points — 66 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs 61 for GPT 5.4. The choice comes down to capability profile and price. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the higher Vals/AA intelligence score (60 vs 51). Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more affordable at $3.0/1M input — about 2× cheaper than $7.0/1M. Claude Sonnet 4.6's 1M context window dwarfs GPT 5.4's 256K — a meaningful difference for long-document or codebase work.