90.6%
MMLU
Models / Anthropic
Claude Sonnet · Released 2026-02-17
Anthropic's February 2026 mid-tier model. Vals Index 60.30% (#3 on the public leaderboard — beats GPT 5.4 Mini and Gemini 3 Flash). SWE-bench Verified 79.6%, ARC-AGI-2 58.3%. 1M context, $3 / $15 per 1M tokens — 5× cheaper than Opus 4.8 on input.
The default for production work that needs Anthropic's voice and tool-use discipline without the Opus 4.8 price tag. SWE-bench Verified 79.6% makes it strong enough for most coding agents.
81average across 10 tested families
Where Claude Sonnet 4.6 places on each public benchmark source that publishes a row. Rank counts every model with a latest row in the same test — not a universal quality score.
The three highest-scoring carded models in each capability family. Where Claude Sonnet 4.6 shows up, it's highlighted.
Benchmark rows added to the public ledger for Claude Sonnet 4.6 in the last 120 days. Older rows live in the full table below.
| Benchmark | Family | Score | Source | Days ago |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-LCR | Long context | 57.67% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| AA output speed | Performance | 60 t/s | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| AA time to first token | Performance | 1.18s | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | Reasoning | 35.9% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | Reasoning | 13.2% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| IFBench | Reasoning | 41.16% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| SciCode | Coding | 46.9% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| τ³-Bench Banking | Agentic | 79.53% | Artificial Analysis | 2 |
| Terminal-Bench | Agentic | 68.4% | Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard | 44 |
| GPQA Diamond | Reasoning | 77.2% | Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond evaluation | 44 |
| MCP Atlas | Tool use | 75.4% | MCP Atlas leaderboard | 44 |
| Vals Index | Agentic | 60.3% | Vals AI — Vals Index | 49 |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coding | 79.6% | SWE-bench official leaderboard | 54 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) | Human preference | 1396 | LMArena leaderboard | 59 |
| BFCL | Tool use | 88.7% | Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard V4 | 99 |
| LiveBench | Reasoning | 67.2% | LiveBench leaderboard | 99 |
| LongBench v2 | Long context | 52.6% | LongBench v2 leaderboard | 113 |
A high composite that hides a weak family is a trap. These bars surface the families where this model hasn't been publicly tested, and where it leads.
Hover or tab any dot for name, score, and input price.
Every catalog benchmark for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Scores link to the original source; gaps mean no public row exists yet.
24 of 32 catalog benchmarks have a sourced row for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
58.3%
ARC-AGI-2 semi-private
35.9%
AA Intelligence Index v4.1
77.2%
GPQA Diamond
13.2%
HLE (AA run)
41.16%
IFBench (AA run)
67.2%
LiveBench
84.2%
MATH
94.1% pass@1
HumanEval
46.9%
SciCode (AA run)
79.6%
SWE-bench Verified
68.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (audited harness)
60.3%
Vals Index
79.53%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA run; maps to τ³ explainer)
66.2%
MMMU
57.67%
AA-LCR (AA run)
52.6%
LongBench v2
60 t/s
Median output tokens/s (1k prompt, default provider)
1.18s
Median time to first token (1k prompt, default provider)
89.2%
HELM Safety
1396
LMArena Elo (Style Controlled)