← All tools
DOSSIER · Research assistant · DRAFT · VERIFIED 13 Oct 2026
SciSpace38DraftPaper discovery, PDF reading and literature-table preparationVerified 2026-10-13

Dossier · Research assistant

SciSpace

A paper workspace is not a checked bibliography.

What is SciSpace?

Decision

Paper discovery, PDF reading and literature-table preparation

Choose it when
  • Students exploring a topic who want paper search and PDF questions in the same workspace
  • Researchers considering a literature table, with time to check each extracted field against the paper
Skip it when
  • You need a reproducible systematic-review search and expect this dossier to establish that SciSpace meets your protocol
  • You cannot upload unpublished or sensitive work until training, retention and processing terms are fully checked
Cost
List prices checked 13 Oct 2026: Premium $20/month or $12/month billed annually; Advanced $90/month or $70/month billed annually; Max $200/month or $160/month billed annually.
Privacy
SciSpace's help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says uploaded PDFs are private and are not used to train its AI models, for both free and paid users; rechecked 13 Oct 2026.

Watch for Agent credits meter tasks, not a completed review. The guide says a task pauses if credits run out mid-workflow; its example costs are illustrative, not a quote for your query.

Synthesized7 sourcespricing checked 13 Oct 2026privacy checked 13 Oct 2026

What these labels mean
Editorial fit
0–100 desk score for research-workflow fit. Not stars, not a benchmark.
Evidence level
How close the desk got: self-run, hands-on, synthesized, or vendor claim.
Dossier depth
Flagship, Solid, Lightweight, and Draft describe how finished the page is — not which tool is best.
Verification date
When pricing or privacy was last opened at the source. Not a re-score of the whole dossier.
Benchmark status
Pending means no relevant first-party test is published yet. It is not a negative score.

Open the glossary · Read the methodology

SciSpace is a tool in the VerdictPal Research assistant set: Paper search, PDF chat, literature tables and writing tools in one web workspace, with credit-metered Agent tasks; citation reliability and the practical free-tier limits still need a desk trial. It scores 38 out of 100 on editorial fit.

Role: Paper discovery, PDF reading and literature-table preparationCategory: Research assistantSynthesized
SciSpace at a glance, with the date each field was checked.
FieldValue
Editorial fit38 out of 100
Dossier statusDraft
SetResearch assistant
Role in a workflowPaper discovery, PDF reading and literature-table preparation
PricingPremium (monthly) $20/mo · Premium (annual) $144/yr · Advanced (monthly) $90/mo · Advanced (annual) $840/yr · Max (monthly) $200/mo · Max (annual) $1,920/yr · Enterprise Custom
Training on your dataSciSpace's help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says uploaded PDFs are private and are not used to train its AI models, for free and paid users; rechecked 13 Oct 2026. This covers Library PDFs, not a verified rule for prompts, chats or Agent outputs. The policy was unreadable in the 11 Oct shell pass; a 13 Oct text fetch does not replace the pending browser reconciliation. No blanket no-training guarantee or verified training opt-out is asserted.
Last verified2026-10-13

Public facts · vendor & repo

List prices and pay-as-you-go entry points we can cite without running our own bench. Each tile links to a source when possible.

$20/month or $144/year before discountsPremium list priceSciSpace pricing, 13 Oct 2026 ↗

Limits & product surface

Non-price vendor claims — multipliers, caps, and API scope. Detailed matrices live in subscription and SDK sections below.

Agent credits
The guide assigns credits to Agent tasks, not standalone tools; task costs vary and a task can pause when credits run out.Credits guide, rechecked 13 Oct 2026 ↗
Uploaded-PDF training
Help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says no model training on uploaded PDFs, for free and paid users. Broader input rules remain open.PDF privacy help ↗
Student access
The older editor FAQ advertises University Program free licences on application. Current scope and Premium eligibility need confirmation.Editor FAQ, not research-plan pricing ↗
Zotero
A connection guide is listed in Library help; import completeness has not been tested.Library help collection ↗

How it works · agent loop

The public positioning for this product — the loop we score against on VerdictPal.

Define the question and the upload boundary

Write your research question and inclusion criteria. Start with public papers you have permission to upload; do not put a confidential thesis or patient material into an unverified data workflow.

Run a controlled 20-paper extraction

Use the same paper set and fields as the Elicit comparison. Build a hand-coded reference table first, then compare SciSpace's fields and source passages. This is a proposed task, not a completed trial.

Verify the bibliography and the claim

Check titles, authors and DOIs independently, then read the passage supporting each claim. Record unsupported interpretations separately from references that do not exist; do not collapse both into an invented accuracy score.

Check credits before committing

Log the Agent balance before and after the task and any pause or upgrade prompt. Compare the completed artifact, correction effort and actual limits with Elicit or Consensus, not just the subscription price.

Who it fits, where it fails

Best for

  • Students exploring a topic who want paper search and PDF questions in the same workspace
  • Researchers considering a literature table, with time to check each extracted field against the paper
  • Readers working with public papers rather than confidential manuscripts
  • A small, controlled trial of Agent tasks before committing to an annual subscription

Avoid if

  • You need a reproducible systematic-review search and expect this dossier to establish that SciSpace meets your protocol
  • You cannot upload unpublished or sensitive work until training, retention and processing terms are fully checked
  • You need a confirmed free-tier workload or a predictable Agent budget before starting
  • You want an AI-detector result to prove that a student cheated

Strengths

  • Scientific paper search
  • Literature Review workspace and tables
  • Chat with PDF and Copilot reading assistance
  • Research-paper data extraction
  • SciSpace Agent research tasks
  • AI Writer
  • Paraphraser
  • Citation Generator
  • AI Detector, not proof of authorship
  • Library folders and PDF management
  • Zotero connection documented in the help centre

Weaknesses

  • Agent credits meter tasks, not a completed review. The guide says a task pauses if credits run out mid-workflow; its example costs are illustrative, not a quote for your query.
  • A list of cited papers is not proof that each paper supports the answer. Our citation trial is pending; open the source and check the passage before using the claim.
  • Search coverage and reproducibility have not been tested here. Do not treat a tidy literature table as evidence that niche or contrary studies were all found.
  • The AI detector is not evidence of misconduct, and its error rate has not been verified for this dossier. A percentage on screen should not become an accusation.
  • Paraphrasing or generated writing can cross your course or journal's integrity rules. Rewording a passage does not remove the need to cite it or disclose prohibited assistance.
  • The help centre's no-training statement covers uploaded PDFs, not every prompt, chat or Agent output. The broader policy still needs a browser pass before confidential uploads.

How it could improve

  • Citation accuracy needs investment. A citation-verification pass against Semantic Scholar or CrossRef before presenting a source would catch the worst fabrication errors.
  • Coverage gaps could be narrowed by expanding the corpus beyond the current strong disciplines, or by surfacing coverage limitations explicitly so the reader knows where not to trust the tool.
  • Citation accuracy needs investment. A citation-verification pass against Semantic Scholar or CrossRef before presenting a source would catch the worst fabrication errors.
  • Extracted values that require manual verification suggest the extraction pipeline needs a confidence-checking layer, cross-reference extracted claims against the original passage before presenting them as fact.
  • Editorial fit scores 38/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Free-tier utility scores 0/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Cost-to-value scores 50/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Opportunity cost scores 0/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Source grounding scores 0/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Privacy posture scores 40/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Evidence strength scores 45/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Reliability scores 0/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.
  • Data portability scores 0/100, the weakest dimension on this dossier. Addressing this would meaningfully raise the editorial fit.

Search modes · 4 lenses

One input box, many retrieval postures. Filter by tier.

01Free

Literature search

Search papers and draft summaries; free-tier credit limits are unverified, so verify in your account.

02Free

Chat with PDF

Ask questions about an uploaded PDF; SciSpace's PDF privacy help says uploaded PDFs aren't used for training. Verify the scope for prompts and chats.

03Free

Library & Zotero

Manage PDFs and connect Zotero; import completeness unverified.

04Pro

Agent tasks

Premium is $20/month with 1,200 credits; tasks pause when credits run out.

Competitive lens

Where SciSpace wins for cited research — and where a rival still belongs in the stack.

The useful comparison is the same paper set and extraction fields. SciSpace combines search, PDF chat and writing; Elicit's dossier centres on evidence tables and review workflows. No head-to-head result has been measured here.

SciSpace

  • Consider SciSpace if you want to try PDF reading and writing alongside search; this is a feature-fit question, not a tested win.

Elicit

  • Consider Elicit when structured extraction is the main task; compare current quotas and verify each field before choosing.

Scores and evidence

Metric lab · 16 dimensions

Click a tile for the editorial note. Color follows score: coral, yellow, mint.

Shape

Avg 38 · 0–75

38Editorial fit

Provisional, source-synthesized; no hands-on testing. Weighted mean of 13 dimensions using the published rubric; flagged zeros for free utility, switching cost, source grounding and reliability remain included. Based on the vendor sources below, not a citation trial.

By group

Fit61
  • Editorial fit38
  • Wedge task fit70
  • Feature depth75
Cost17
  • Free-tier utility0
  • Cost-to-value50
  • Opportunity cost0
Trust41
  • Source grounding0
  • Privacy posture40
  • Failure transparency60
  • Evidence strength45
  • Transparency60
Workflow35
  • Integration reach60
  • Setup friction60
  • Reliability0
  • Competitive position55
  • Data portability0

Editorial evidence · 2 entries

Task

Check individual plan list prices

The 13 Oct pricing page matches the 11 Oct research note for Premium, Advanced and Max; Premium lists 1,200 monthly credits.

↳ Vendor prices, not a purchase or workload-cost test. Checkout currency and effective limits need confirmation.

Task

Check the scope of the PDF training statement

The help article dated 4 Mar 2025 explicitly covers uploaded PDFs for free and paid users. A broader policy text became fetch-readable on 13 Oct.

↳ Vendor statements, not a data-flow audit. Browser reconciliation and prompt/chat rules remain open.

Test scenarios · hands-on lab

How we exercised the product. Step through each run before you trust the scores.

Test run

Step 1 of 4

Ask the proposed intermittent-fasting, LLM-reference and school-smartphone-policy questions.

Research log · desk notes

What we learned while building this dossier — not vendor copy.

Vendor credits guide ↗

A returned guide does not finish the trial

The 11 Oct research note recorded a 404 for the credits guide and ambiguous Advanced/Max JSON. On 13 Oct the guide was readable and the pricing page still matched the recorded list prices. Basic usage, practical fair-use ceilings and the free-tier citation trial remain untested; no numeric Basic/Advanced/Max allowance is copied here.

Privacy policy, browser review pending ↗

PDFs are a narrower promise than all data

The PDF help page was re-read. The policy, unreadable in the 11 Oct shell pass, returned text on 13 Oct, but still needs browser verification. No forum quotation is treated as a verified policy clause, and no contradiction or blanket no-training guarantee is asserted.

What it costs, what it keeps

Pricing deck · checked 2026-10-13

Basic / free access

Free access; current limits untested

Check the live account before planning a review

  • No Basic credit allowance is asserted in this draft.
  • The guide was 404 on 11 Oct and readable on 13 Oct; an account trial is still pending.

Premium

$20 monthly / $12 per month annually

1,200 monthly credits listed

Annual total $144 before discounts; dollar currency to confirm at checkout

  • Listed price, not a tested cost per research task.
  • SCI30 is advertised for yearly plans, not monthly subscriptions.

RAW · checked 2026-10-13: List prices checked 13 Oct 2026: Premium $20/month or $12/month billed annually; Advanced $90/month or $70/month billed annually; Max $200/month or $160/month billed annually. Premium lists 1,200 monthly credits. Basic/free usage has not been tested; no free-credit figure is asserted here. Advanced/Max effective allowances and fair-use limits remain unverified. Enterprise is by application. Dollar amounts are treated as USD for this dossier; confirm checkout currency, taxes and limits. The help article dated 20 Apr 2026 lists SCI30 for 30% off yearly plans outside INR billing, or IND30 for INR; monthly plans are excluded. The older editor FAQ advertises University Program free student licences on application, not automatic access or a confirmed Premium entitlement.

Privacy deep-dive · checked 2026-10-13

SciSpace's help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says uploaded PDFs are private and are not used to train its AI models, for both free and paid users; rechecked 13 Oct 2026. That statement is about PDFs in the Library, not a verified no-training rule for prompts, chats or Agent outputs. The 11 Oct research pass could not read the client-rendered privacy policy from shell. A text fetch on 13 Oct returned a policy effective 10 Apr 2024 describing US hosting and retention as long as needed for service or business purposes, with legal exceptions. A browser pass is still needed to check the embedded policy and reconcile its scope with the PDF help page. No specific PDF retention period, completed deletion test, EU-only option or enterprise-provider no-training agreement is verified here. Do not upload confidential work on the strength of the PDF statement alone.

Training on your dataSciSpace's help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says uploaded PDFs are private and are not used to train its AI models, for free and paid users; rechecked 13 Oct 2026. This covers Library PDFs, not a verified rule for prompts, chats or Agent outputs. The policy was unreadable in the 11 Oct shell pass; a 13 Oct text fetch does not replace the pending browser reconciliation. No blanket no-training guarantee or verified training opt-out is asserted.
EU data residencyThe policy text fetched 13 Oct 2026 describes US hosting and possible processing elsewhere. No EU-only option has been verified; the embedded policy still needs a browser pass. EU data-subject rights do not establish EU data residency.
SOC 2 attestationNo primary SciSpace SOC 2 report was checked as of 13 Oct 2026. Secondary certification claims are not verification; the PDF help page's security wording is not a SOC 2 report.
Local-first by defaultThe documented product is a hosted web workspace with PDFs stored in the SciSpace Library. No local-only workflow was verified in the sources checked 13 Oct 2026; a private Library is not local storage.

Under the hood

Vendors named on the product about page — useful for procurement and privacy reviews.

Paper search and PDF questions
SciSpace
Reference library connection
Zotero

Alternatives and context

Workflow roles

How this tool fits into a composed research stack:

Find papers for an initial reading listAsk questions about public PDFsPrepare and verify a literature tableCheck source passages before writing

Deep panes · 10 lenses

Editorial lenses only. Subscription and API pricing live in their own sections above.

Sources and provenance

Source ledger · 7 checked

Quality gate · Draft

Evidence ready

Verdict history

  • Added an unscored bilingual draft with current list prices, the scoped PDF training statement, research-workflow cautions and explicit testing gaps. No desk recommendation.

Related dossiers

Browse the atlas

Questions this dossier answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

What is SciSpace?

SciSpace is a tool in the VerdictPal Research assistant set: Paper search, PDF chat, literature tables and writing tools in one web workspace, with credit-metered Agent tasks; citation reliability and the practical free-tier limits still need a desk trial. It scores 38 out of 100 on editorial fit.

Is SciSpace worth using?

SciSpace scores 38 out of 100 on editorial fit and carries Draft dossier status. Its job in a research workflow is: Paper discovery, PDF reading and literature-table preparation.

Who is SciSpace best for?

SciSpace earns its place when you need:

  • Students exploring a topic who want paper search and PDF questions in the same workspace
  • Researchers considering a literature table, with time to check each extracted field against the paper
  • Readers working with public papers rather than confidential manuscripts
  • A small, controlled trial of Agent tasks before committing to an annual subscription

When should you not use SciSpace?

Skip SciSpace in these cases:

  • You need a reproducible systematic-review search and expect this dossier to establish that SciSpace meets your protocol
  • You cannot upload unpublished or sensitive work until training, retention and processing terms are fully checked
  • You need a confirmed free-tier workload or a predictable Agent budget before starting
  • You want an AI-detector result to prove that a student cheated

What does SciSpace cost?

Premium (monthly) $20/mo · Premium (annual) $144/yr · Advanced (monthly) $90/mo · Advanced (annual) $840/yr · Max (monthly) $200/mo · Max (annual) $1,920/yr · Enterprise Custom. Pricing last checked 2026-10-13.

Does SciSpace train on your data?

SciSpace's help article dated 4 Mar 2025 says uploaded PDFs are private and are not used to train its AI models, for free and paid users; rechecked 13 Oct 2026. This covers Library PDFs, not a verified rule for prompts, chats or Agent outputs. The policy was unreadable in the 11 Oct shell pass; a 13 Oct text fetch does not replace the pending browser reconciliation. No blanket no-training guarantee or verified training opt-out is asserted.. Privacy terms last checked 2026-10-13.

What goes wrong with SciSpace?

The dossier publishes 6 failure modes for SciSpace, and they stay published whether or not the vendor likes them:

  • Agent credits meter tasks, not a completed review. The guide says a task pauses if credits run out mid-workflow; its example costs are illustrative, not a quote for your query.
  • A list of cited papers is not proof that each paper supports the answer. Our citation trial is pending; open the source and check the passage before using the claim.
  • Search coverage and reproducibility have not been tested here. Do not treat a tidy literature table as evidence that niche or contrary studies were all found.
  • The AI detector is not evidence of misconduct, and its error rate has not been verified for this dossier. A percentage on screen should not become an accusation.
  • Paraphrasing or generated writing can cross your course or journal's integrity rules. Rewording a passage does not remove the need to cite it or disclose prohibited assistance.
  • The help centre's no-training statement covers uploaded PDFs, not every prompt, chat or Agent output. The broader policy still needs a browser pass before confidential uploads.

What are the alternatives to SciSpace?

The closest options to SciSpace are Elicit, Consensus, Scite, NotebookLM, Semantic Scholar, Perplexity. Each one that has a tool in the atlas is linked from this dossier, with a head-to-head comparison.

The Pack · Editorial newsletter

Know when the rules move.

One short email when a university changes its AI rule for theses, or a research tool changes its pricing or privacy terms. No tracking, no third-party analytics. Unsubscribe in one click.