VerdictPal · editorial desk · 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Head-to-head

Pick two cards. See the diff.

Stat bars are editorial heuristics, methodology linked — not a fake benchmark leaderboard. Put two dossiers side by side and see where each one breaks.

Compare · Card A / Card B·Head-to-head

KagivsYou.com

In the AI search set, Kagi edges ahead overall (editorial fit 92 vs 64). Kagi wins on citation honesty, source quality, privacy controls, speed, and value for money; the rest is a wash. Both pass our quality gate. The right pick is the one whose strengths match the job you're trying to do.

Kagi · avg
83
wins 11 of 16
You.com · avg
70
wins 4 of 16
Fields differ
11
of 16 dossier rows
Receipts
18
sources + bench notes

Checked 2026-06-09 · Kagi·Checked 2026-06-09 · You.com

Dossier fields

Sixteen fields, side by side.

No.FieldKagiYou.com
01Status · Editorial quality gateSolidSolid
02Editorial fit · 0–100 score92 / 10064 / 100
03CategoryAI searchAI search
04Primary surfaceProsumer SaaSAPI
05Modalities
  • Text
  • Text
  • Image
  • Code
06Role in a stackPrivate paid web search and AI-search alternativeAI search and web-grounding API alternative
07Best for
  • Users who want ad-free search without behavioral advertising
  • Research workflows that benefit from domain ranking, blocking, pinning, lenses, and lower SEO sludge
  • Privacy-conscious users willing to pay instead of trading search behavior for ads
  • People who want a web-search baseline before using Perplexity, ChatGPT, or Google AI summaries
  • Developers who need web search APIs to ground AI systems
  • Teams comparing AI-search APIs against Exa, Perplexity, Brave, Tavily-style APIs, and Google-based systems
  • Enterprise buyers that need SOC2 positioning, DPA-ready workflows, high rate limits, and configurable retention
  • AI-agent products where snippets, sources, freshness, and cost predictability matter more than a consumer UI
08Avoid if
  • You need free unlimited search
  • You will not benchmark result quality against your current baseline before paying
  • You need formal institutional guarantees for every Kagi Assistant model/provider path before use
  • You want an academic database or systematic-review tool rather than cleaner general web search
  • You want a stable consumer-search review and the product surface is currently API-first in public positioning
  • You need no-cloud sensitive research uploads or guaranteed zero-retention without the right enterprise/API terms
  • You need academic-source rigor rather than broad web snippets, ranked URLs, and AI-generated research answers
  • You want a simple student subscription rather than developer/API pricing
09Capabilities tracked
  • Paid ad-free search
  • 100-search trial
  • Starter 300 searches/mo
  • Professional unlimited search
  • Ultimate Premium AI/Research mode
  • result ranking/blocking/pinning/lenses
  • Kagi Assistant
  • Privacy Pass and Tor/onion support
  • PayPal/OpenNode payment
  • fair-pricing credit
  • Search API $5/1k calls
  • Contents API $1/1k pages
  • Research API from $12/1k calls
  • Finance Research API from $110/1k calls
  • free MCP you-search profile up to 100 queries/day
  • $100 start credit
  • LLM-ready snippets
  • clean Markdown/raw HTML extraction
  • cited multi-step synthesis
  • country/language targeting
  • SOC 2/DPA/ZDR/no-training enterprise posture
10Failure modes · Documented, not buried
  • Paid search only makes sense if result quality beats baseline
  • Starter quota can be too small for heavy researchers
  • Assistant privacy depends on Kagi plus third-party model providers
  • Research mode and flagship models require Ultimate
  • Cloud search still needs trust
  • Custom ranking can create a filter bubble
  • Consumer/API surfaces can shift quickly
  • Broad web search is not academic verification
  • ZDR and no-training must be verified for exact endpoint/account/contract
  • Service may use multiple LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google
  • API cost scales by endpoint, calls, pages, and result volume
  • Research API benchmark claims need independent reproduction
11Evidence levelEditorial · hands-onEditorial · hands-on
12Sources verified · Receipts on the dossier
13Benchmark entries
  • Run 25 research, product, local, and navigational queries against Kagi, Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Perplexity, and You.com.
    Pending.
  • Apply ranking/blocking/pinning/lenses for a research domain and rerun 10 queries.
    Pending.
  • Run 10 Assistant questions on public sources only; inspect model/provider path, retention controls, and answer citations.
    Pending.
  • Run 20 current-event, product, technical-docs, local, and academic-adjacent queries through You.com and competitors.
    Pending.
  • Create a mini DeepSearchQA-style prompt set and compare You.com Research API outputs against Exa Agent, Perplexity Sonar, and manual search.
    Pending.
  • Verify exact ZDR behavior and retention controls for the plan/API key used.
    Pending.
14Alternatives tracked
  • Perplexity
  • You.com
  • Google Search
  • Brave Search
  • DuckDuckGo
  • Perplexity
  • Kagi
  • Google Search
  • ChatGPT
  • Brave Search
15Pricing checked2026-06-092026-06-09
16Last verified2026-06-092026-06-09
16 metrics

Sixteen numbers, one shared midline.

KagivsYou.com

In the AI search set, Kagi edges ahead overall (editorial fit 92 vs 64). Kagi wins on citation honesty, source quality, privacy controls, speed, and value for money; the rest is a wash. Both pass our quality gate. The right pick is the one whose strengths match the job you're trying to do.

  1. Editorial fit
    Kagi92You.com64
  2. Source quality
    Kagi76You.com55
  3. Citation honesty
    Kagi88You.com66
  4. Privacy controls
    Kagi96You.com45
  5. Value for money
    Kagi74You.com64
  6. Speed
    Kagi86You.com74
  7. Integration
    Kagi78You.com88
  8. Onboarding
    Kagi86You.com74
  9. Reliability
    Kagi88You.com76
  10. Feature depth
    Kagi86You.com95
  11. Data portability
    Kagi59You.com77
  12. Transparency
    Kagi98You.com98
  13. Ecosystem reach
    Kagi78You.com88
  14. Documentation
    Kagi76You.com55
  15. Independence
    Kagi96You.com45
  16. Affordability
    Kagi68You.com51
Kagi · avg 83 · wins 11 of 160avg 70 · wins 4 of 16 · You.com
EvidenceKagi 4 · You.com 0
  1. 01Editorial fit
    92
    64
  2. 02Source quality
    76
    55
  3. 03Citation honesty
    88
    66
  4. 04Privacy controls
    96
    45
PrivacyKagi 3 · You.com 1
  1. 05Value for money
    74
    64
  2. 06Speed
    86
    74
  3. 07Integration
    78
    88
  4. 08Onboarding
    86
    74
CapabilityKagi 1 · You.com 2
  1. 09Reliability
    88
    76
  2. 10Feature depth
    86
    95
  3. 11Data portability
    59
    77
  4. 12Transparency
    98
    98
Cost & fitKagi 3 · You.com 1
  1. 13Ecosystem reach
    78
    88
  2. 14Documentation
    76
    55
  3. 15Independence
    96
    45
  4. 16Affordability
    68
    51
CARD A · Kagi

Private paid web search and AI-search alternativeUser-funded, ad-free search engine with paid web search, result controls, privacy-oriented defaults, Privacy Pass/Tor support, and optional Kagi Assistant modes.

CARD B · You.com

AI search and web-grounding API alternativeEnterprise-oriented web search API and research API platform for grounding AI systems, with consumer search/chat roots, SOC2 positioning, DPA-ready terms, and zero-data-retention options.

Privacy facets

Where each card is actually private.

KagiYou.com
Training on your dataUnknownUnknown: Not statedUnknownUnknown: Not stated
EU data residencyNoNo: Not documentedNoNo: Not documented
SOC 2 attestationNoNo: Not documentedYesYes: Documented
Local-first by defaultNoNo: Cloud onlyNoNo: Cloud only
Capability split

What each card does uniquely.

Only Kagi10

  • Paid ad-free search
  • 100-search trial
  • Starter 300 searches/mo
  • Professional unlimited search
  • Ultimate Premium AI/Research mode
  • result ranking/blocking/pinning/lenses
  • Kagi Assistant
  • Privacy Pass and Tor/onion support
  • PayPal/OpenNode payment
  • fair-pricing credit

Shared0

No overlap detected.

Only You.com11

  • Search API $5/1k calls
  • Contents API $1/1k pages
  • Research API from $12/1k calls
  • Finance Research API from $110/1k calls
  • free MCP you-search profile up to 100 queries/day
  • $100 start credit
  • LLM-ready snippets
  • clean Markdown/raw HTML extraction
  • cited multi-step synthesis
  • country/language targeting
  • SOC 2/DPA/ZDR/no-training enterprise posture
Failure modes

Where each card breaks.

Kagi

  • Paid search only makes sense if result quality beats baseline
  • Starter quota can be too small for heavy researchers
  • Assistant privacy depends on Kagi plus third-party model providers
  • Research mode and flagship models require Ultimate
  • Cloud search still needs trust
  • Custom ranking can create a filter bubble

You.com

  • Consumer/API surfaces can shift quickly
  • Broad web search is not academic verification
  • ZDR and no-training must be verified for exact endpoint/account/contract
  • Service may use multiple LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google
  • API cost scales by endpoint, calls, pages, and result volume
  • Research API benchmark claims need independent reproduction
Pricing

Pulled straight from each dossier.

Kagi

AI search
  • FREETrial
  • $5/MOStarter
  • $10/MOProfessional

raw · Trial free: 100 searches + 100 Assistant interactions · Starter USD 5/mo: 300 searches · Professional USD 10/mo: unlimited search · Ultimate USD 25/mo: Premium AI, Research mode, flagship models · annual −10% · unused-month credit.

You.com

AI search
  • FREEFree
  • $15/MOYouPro
  • CUSTOMYouPro Max

raw · Verified from official You.com pricing/docs on 2026-06-07: $100 free credit to start; Search API $5/1k calls; Contents API $1/1k pages; Research API starts at $12/1k calls; Finance Research API starts at $110/1k calls; free MCP profile allows you-search with no signup/API key up to 100 queries/day; enterprise adds custom QPS, volume discounts, annual savings, SOC 2, DPA-ready posture, Zero Data Retention options, and no model training claims.

Verdict

Which card to actually pick.

In the AI search set, Kagi edges ahead overall (editorial fit 92 vs 64). Kagi wins on citation honesty, source quality, privacy controls, speed, and value for money; the rest is a wash. Both pass our quality gate. The right pick is the one whose strengths match the job you're trying to do.