VerdictPal
Join
VerdictPal · editorial desk · updated 16 Oct 2026VerdictPal
Compare · Head-to-head

Ai2 Asta vs Elicit: pricing, privacy & capabilities

Put two dossiers side by side: fit, cost, privacy, and the failure modes that actually change the choice.
ToolsModels

Compare · Tool A / Tool B·Head-to-head

Ai2 AstavsElicit

In the Research assistant set, Elicit edges ahead overall (editorial fit 59 vs 34). Ai2 Asta wins on privacy controls; Elicit wins on citation honesty, source quality, speed, and value for money. For the canonical workflow, pick Elicit. Use Ai2 Asta when its niche specifically wins above.

Ai2 Asta · avg
32
wins 2 of 16
Elicit · avg
65
wins 14 of 16
Fields differ
11
of 16 dossier rows
Receipts
20
sources + bench notes

Checked 2026-10-13 · Ai2 Asta·Checked 2026-10-13 · Elicit

Dossier fields

Sixteen fields, side by side.

No.FieldAi2 AstaElicit
01Status · Editorial quality gateDraftFlagship
02Editorial fit · 0–100 score34 / 10059 / 100
03CategoryResearch assistantResearch assistant
04Primary surfaceConsumer appProsumer SaaS
05Modalities
  • Text
  • Data
  • Text
  • Data
06Role in a stackFind papers, explore literature and analyze non-sensitive dataPaper discovery, evidence-table extraction, and systematic-review support
07Best for
  • Students trying a scholarly search assistant for an initial reading list, with time to open the papers
  • Researchers exploring a question through paper search, citation following and short literature reports
  • An exploratory analysis of non-sensitive structured research data, checked against your own calculations
  • A controlled trial of the public assistant before relying on experimental Preview features
  • Building structured evidence tables across many papers
  • Early-stage systematic review screening and extraction workflows
  • Researchers who need cited summaries plus column-based extraction, not just a chatbot answer
  • Policy, pharma, medtech, and academic teams that value sentence-level citations, PRISMA-style method traces, and auditable extraction
08Avoid if
  • Your dataset is sensitive or regulated: Ai2's FAQ explicitly says not to upload it to hosted Asta
  • You need a confirmed price, credit allowance or account-access rule before planning the work
  • You expect one data exploration to accept follow-up questions beyond its documented 24-hour window
  • You need a verified systematic-review search or an independently measured citation-reliability result
  • You need a cheap casual search tool rather than a high-cost research workflow
  • Your review data, uploaded PDFs, or unpublished documents cannot leave local infrastructure without a DPA
  • You expect PRISMA-grade results without human screening, extraction checks, and protocol review
  • Your main need is reference management or citation writing rather than evidence synthesis
09Capabilities tracked
  • Scholarly paper search
  • Research-query decomposition
  • Following citations to find related papers
  • Paper relevance assessment, according to Ai2
  • Literature summaries and mini-reviews
  • Analysis of uploaded structured datasets
  • Data visualizations
  • CSV, XLSX, JSON/JSONL, HDF5, TSV and Parquet uploads
  • Exploration-level dataset deletion for signed-in users
  • Asta Preview access to experimental features
  • Search across 138M+ papers
  • ClinicalTrials.gov source support
  • Paper chat with full-text access
  • Zotero import
  • Automated Reports
  • Systematic Review Workflow
  • Screening up to 5,000 papers on Pro and 40,000 on Enterprise
  • Extraction columns
  • Sentence-level citations
  • PRISMA/methods/search-strategy report outputs
  • API access
10Failure modes · Documented, not buried
  • The FAQ's data explorations stop accepting follow-ups after 24 hours. A longer analysis needs a new exploration, not a continuation of the same conversation.
  • Uploaded datasets are purged after seven days, according to the FAQ. Keep your own source files; an exploration is not a dataset archive.
  • Anonymous data explorations depend on browser cookies. Clearing them loses access and deletion control; the FAQ also says inactive anonymous explorations are deleted after 30 days.
  • Ai2 advertises far more abstracts than full-text papers. The corpus figures do not establish that Asta can read every paper needed for your question; our coverage and citation checks are pending.
  • Preview features are experimental, and leaving Preview removes access to them. The public-versus-Preview feature split has not been tested here as of 13 Oct 2026.
  • AstaBench belongs to the Ai2 ecosystem. Its existence is not an independent evaluation of answers from asta.allen.ai, and this dossier reports no measured accuracy or hallucination rate.
  • Pricing jumps quickly from free to Pro/Scale
  • Structured tables and reports still require human validation
  • Uploaded papers/Zotero imports create cloud privacy boundary
  • Corpus and full-text coverage vary by discipline
  • Vendor accuracy claims need independent reproduction
  • Basic plan limits can distort real review workflows
11Evidence levelSynthesizedSynthesized
12Sources verified · Receipts on the dossier
13Benchmark entries
  • Check the advertised literature corpus
    The homepage checked 13 Oct 2026 advertises 108M+ abstracts and 12M+ full-text papers.
  • Check dataset retention and training scope
    The FAQ's Analyze data section states seven-day upload deletion, no raw-dataset training and no interaction training without explicit opt-in.
None recorded
14Alternatives tracked
  • Elicit
  • Consensus
  • SciSpace
  • Semantic Scholar
  • Scite
  • Consensus
  • Scite
  • Semantic Scholar
  • Rayyan
  • Connected Papers
15Pricing checked2026-10-132026-10-13
16Last verified2026-10-132026-10-13
16 metrics

Sixteen numbers, one shared midline.

Ai2 AstavsElicit

In the Research assistant set, Elicit edges ahead overall (editorial fit 59 vs 34). Ai2 Asta wins on privacy controls; Elicit wins on citation honesty, source quality, speed, and value for money. For the canonical workflow, pick Elicit. Use Ai2 Asta when its niche specifically wins above.

  1. Editorial fit
    Ai2 Asta34Elicit59
  2. Source quality
    Ai2 Asta45Elicit52
  3. Citation honesty
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit70
  4. Privacy controls
    Ai2 Asta50Elicit46
  5. Value for money
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit56
  6. Speed
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit58
  7. Integration
    Ai2 Asta55Elicit75
  8. Onboarding
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit58
  9. Reliability
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit70
  10. Feature depth
    Ai2 Asta70Elicit100
  11. Data portability
    Ai2 Asta40Elicit55
  12. Transparency
    Ai2 Asta70Elicit100
  13. Ecosystem reach
    Ai2 Asta55Elicit75
  14. Documentation
    Ai2 Asta45Elicit52
  15. Independence
    Ai2 Asta50Elicit46
  16. Affordability
    Ai2 Asta0Elicit67
Ai2 Asta · avg 32 · wins 2 of 160avg 65 · wins 14 of 16 · Elicit
EvidenceAi2 Asta 1 · Elicit 3
  1. 01Editorial fit
    34
    59
  2. 02Source quality
    45
    52
  3. 03Citation honesty
    0
    70
  4. 04Privacy controls
    50
    46
PrivacyAi2 Asta 0 · Elicit 4
  1. 05Value for money
    0
    56
  2. 06Speed
    0
    58
  3. 07Integration
    55
    75
  4. 08Onboarding
    0
    58
CapabilityAi2 Asta 0 · Elicit 4
  1. 09Reliability
    0
    70
  2. 10Feature depth
    70
    100
  3. 11Data portability
    40
    55
  4. 12Transparency
    70
    100
Cost & fitAi2 Asta 1 · Elicit 3
  1. 13Ecosystem reach
    55
    75
  2. 14Documentation
    45
    52
  3. 15Independence
    50
    46
  4. 16Affordability
    0
    67
TOOL A · Ai2 Asta
Research assistant
Ai2 Asta
34/100
ROLEFind papers, explore literature and analyze non-sensitive data
Editorial fit
34
Source quality
45
Citation honesty
0
Privacy controls
50
Value for money
0
Speed
0
Pricing unverifiedPricing unverified
No public paid tieNo public paid tiers found
Low confidenceLow confidence
DraftVerified 2026-10-13VP·METHOD

Find papers, explore literature and analyze non-sensitive data — Allen Institute for AI's scholarly assistant for finding papers, short literature reports and analysis of structured datasets. Pricing remains unverified; citation checks and a hands-on data trial are still pending.

TOOL B · Elicit
Research assistant
Elicit
59/100
ROLEPaper discovery, evidence-table extraction, and systematic-review support
Editorial fit
59
Source quality
52
Citation honesty
70
Privacy controls
46
Value for money
56
Speed
58
FREEBasic
$132/YRper user
$468/YRper user
FlagshipVerified 2026-10-13VP·METHOD

Paper discovery, evidence-table extraction, and systematic-review support — AI research assistant for searching, summarizing, chatting with papers, screening studies, extracting fields, generating research reports, and supporting systematic reviews across large scientific corpora and uploaded documents.

Privacy facets

Where each tool is actually private.

Ai2 AstaElicit
Training on your dataPartialPartial: Ai2's FAQ, checked 13 Oct 2026, says under Analyze data that raw uploaded datasets are never used for model training. Prompts and interactions may be logged for reliability but are not used to train models without explicit opt-in; opting in may put de-identified interactions into a public research dataset to improve Asta. This is a scoped FAQ statement, not a full-policy audit or a blanket guarantee for every literature query. No account or data-flow trial was run.UnknownUnknown: Elicit's privacy policy does not say whether content from the free Basic plan, paid Pro or team-focused Scale plan is used to train AI models, or explain a training-specific opt-out. Do not assume that paying switches training off. Elicit lists “No training on your data by default” for Enterprise. Its API terms say input data is not used to train AI models unless you separately opt in. For the web plans, ask [email protected] to confirm the rule before uploading confidential work. Sources: Elicit, Privacy; Pricing; API terms (linked in Sources)
EU data residencyUnknownUnknown: Hosted EU residency and a DPA are unverified as of 13 Oct 2026. The FAQ directs sensitive or regulated datasets to self-hosting; this does not establish an EU-only hosted option or certify an institution's self-hosted setup.UnknownUnknown: Unknown
SOC 2 attestationUnknownUnknown: Not recorded as a plan-wide guarantee. Check the dossier's privacy notes and sources.UnknownUnknown: Unknown
Local-first by defaultPartialPartial: This dossier focuses on the hosted assistant at asta.allen.ai, not a local-only product. The FAQ describes self-hosting as the path for regulated data. No self-hosted installation or its external model calls were checked as of 13 Oct 2026.UnknownUnknown: Unknown
Capability split

What each tool does uniquely.

Only Ai2 Asta10

  • Scholarly paper search
  • Research-query decomposition
  • Following citations to find related papers
  • Paper relevance assessment, according to Ai2
  • Literature summaries and mini-reviews
  • Analysis of uploaded structured datasets
  • Data visualizations
  • CSV, XLSX, JSON/JSONL, HDF5, TSV and Parquet uploads
  • Exploration-level dataset deletion for signed-in users
  • Asta Preview access to experimental features

Shared0

No overlap detected.

Only Elicit11

  • Search across 138M+ papers
  • ClinicalTrials.gov source support
  • Paper chat with full-text access
  • Zotero import
  • Automated Reports
  • Systematic Review Workflow
  • Screening up to 5,000 papers on Pro and 40,000 on Enterprise
  • Extraction columns
  • Sentence-level citations
  • PRISMA/methods/search-strategy report outputs
  • API access
Failure modes

Where each tool breaks.

Ai2 Asta

  • The FAQ's data explorations stop accepting follow-ups after 24 hours. A longer analysis needs a new exploration, not a continuation of the same conversation.
  • Uploaded datasets are purged after seven days, according to the FAQ. Keep your own source files; an exploration is not a dataset archive.
  • Anonymous data explorations depend on browser cookies. Clearing them loses access and deletion control; the FAQ also says inactive anonymous explorations are deleted after 30 days.
  • Ai2 advertises far more abstracts than full-text papers. The corpus figures do not establish that Asta can read every paper needed for your question; our coverage and citation checks are pending.
  • Preview features are experimental, and leaving Preview removes access to them. The public-versus-Preview feature split has not been tested here as of 13 Oct 2026.
  • AstaBench belongs to the Ai2 ecosystem. Its existence is not an independent evaluation of answers from asta.allen.ai, and this dossier reports no measured accuracy or hallucination rate.

Elicit

  • Pricing jumps quickly from free to Pro/Scale
  • Structured tables and reports still require human validation
  • Uploaded papers/Zotero imports create cloud privacy boundary
  • Corpus and full-text coverage vary by discipline
  • Vendor accuracy claims need independent reproduction
  • Basic plan limits can distort real review workflows
Pricing

Pulled straight from each dossier.

Ai2 Asta

Research assistant
  • Pricing unverifiedPricing unverified
  • No public paid tieNo public paid tiers found
  • Low confidenceLow confidence

raw · Pricing unverified · No public paid tiers found · Low confidence · Checked 13 Oct 2026: the research notes describe apparently free/public hosted access, not a confirmed price or unlimited allowance. The guide's early-access AutoDiscovery hypothesis-credit offer ran through 28 Feb 2026; it does not establish October access or credits for the default assistant. Confirm current terms before budgeting.

Elicit

Research assistant
  • FREEBasic
  • $132/YRper user
  • $468/YRper user

raw · Basic free: limited Research Agent and Research Reports; unlimited search/summaries/chat · Academic pricing, per user and billed yearly: Plus $11/mo ($132/yr), Pro $39/mo ($468/yr), Scale $89/mo ($1,068/yr) · Industry pricing, per user and billed yearly: Pro $49/mo ($588/yr), Scale $169/mo ($2,028/yr) · Enterprise custom; no training on customer data by default (vendor).

Verdict

Which tool to actually pick.

In the Research assistant set, Elicit edges ahead overall (editorial fit 59 vs 34). Ai2 Asta wins on privacy controls; Elicit wins on citation honesty, source quality, speed, and value for money. For the canonical workflow, pick Elicit. Use Ai2 Asta when its niche specifically wins above.

Open Ai2 Asta's dossierOpen Elicit's dossier
Try Ai2 Asta ↗Try Elicit ↗

The Pack · Editorial newsletter

Know when the rules move.

One short email when a university changes its AI rule for theses, or a research tool changes its pricing or privacy terms. No tracking, no third-party analytics. Unsubscribe in one click.

The thesis AI checklist is free to use, no signup needed →

Questions this comparison answers

Every answer below is assembled from the dated fields on this page. Nothing is written separately for search.

Should you use Ai2 Asta or Elicit?

In the Research assistant set, Elicit edges ahead overall (editorial fit 59 vs 34). Ai2 Asta wins on privacy controls; Elicit wins on citation honesty, source quality, speed, and value for money. For the canonical workflow, pick Elicit. Use Ai2 Asta when its niche specifically wins above.

What can Ai2 Asta do that Elicit cannot?

Capabilities documented on the Ai2 Asta tool but not the Elicit tool:

  • Scholarly paper search
  • Research-query decomposition
  • Following citations to find related papers
  • Paper relevance assessment, according to Ai2
  • Literature summaries and mini-reviews
  • Analysis of uploaded structured datasets
  • Data visualizations
  • CSV, XLSX, JSON/JSONL, HDF5, TSV and Parquet uploads
  • Exploration-level dataset deletion for signed-in users
  • Asta Preview access to experimental features

What can Elicit do that Ai2 Asta cannot?

Capabilities documented on the Elicit tool but not the Ai2 Asta tool:

  • Search across 138M+ papers
  • ClinicalTrials.gov source support
  • Paper chat with full-text access
  • Zotero import
  • Automated Reports
  • Systematic Review Workflow
  • Screening up to 5,000 papers on Pro and 40,000 on Enterprise
  • Extraction columns
  • Sentence-level citations
  • PRISMA/methods/search-strategy report outputs
  • API access

Is Ai2 Asta or Elicit cheaper?

Ai2 Asta: Pricing unverified · No public paid tiers found · Low confidence · Checked 13 Oct 2026: the research notes describe apparently free/public hosted access, not a confirmed price or unlimited allowance. The guide's early-access AutoDiscovery hypothesis-credit offer ran through 28 Feb 2026; it does not establish October access or credits for the default assistant. Confirm current terms before budgeting.. Elicit: Basic Free · Academic Plus $132/yr · Academic Pro $468/yr · Academic Scale $1,068/yr · Industry Pro $588/yr · Industry Scale $2,028/yr · Enterprise Custom.

How do Ai2 Asta and Elicit score against each other?

On editorial fit, Ai2 Asta scores 34 out of 100 and Elicit scores 59 out of 100. The score is a fit judgement for source-heavy research work, not a quality ranking — read both dossiers before you pick.