The public record does the citation work. The manuscript stays on your machine. The judgement stays yours.
IntermediateRequired tools from Free – $57.99/mo when every seat is on the cheapest monthly tier.
Vendor annual plans, usage billing, and team seats can change the real bill. Treat this as a floor, not a quote.
The local file for this review. One entry with venue, deadline, confidentiality status, the quoted policy sentence, and your two-sentence summary of the claim. Turn off sync for the collection if the PDF is under embargo.
Check that cited papers exist as described and that the novelty claim holds. Search the manuscript's own framing, not its reference list, and see what comes back that the authors did not cite.
Read the citing context of each load-bearing reference: supporting or contrasting. A reference cited as settled evidence that later work mostly contrasts is a major issue with a public URL behind it.
One job: find the URL of the venue's AI policy. Take the link, close the tab, read the page. Never paste manuscript text here, not even a title.
Opens only when the policy lock reads allowed. Then it pressure-tests the claim map you wrote in your own words. It does not receive the PDF and it does not draft the report.
Grounded questions about the manuscript, and only where the venue says so in writing. If the policy is silent or ambiguous, this stays shut for the whole review.
This stack only earns its keep when you actually follow the run order.